Breaking News > In a 9-0 landmark which sets out sentencing factors judges should (and misconceptions they should not) take into account when punishing sexual crimes against children, the Supreme Court of Canada has signaled courts should adopt a tougher stance than in the past, given society’s contemporary understanding of the nature and gravity of such offences, their inherent wrongfulness, and the profound harms they cause: R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9. MORE TO COME.

Personal Injury

Apportionment or double counting in determining catastrophic impairment

Tuesday, September 10, 2019 @ 4:10 PM | By Michelle Kudlats and Michael Wolkowicz

Under the Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule (SABS) and associated case law, an applicant will meet the legal definition of catastrophic impairment pursuant to the SABS if it is determined that he/she...

To view the full article, Click Here to Subscribe
or sign up for a 14-day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to sign in

Featured

COVID-19 UPDATES

Latest

COVID-19 Manitoba bringing new in-custody quarantines, more inmate phone time

Tax Estate freezes: A silver lining of COVID-19 | Dale Barrett

Constitutional Story image

Saskatchewan Appeal Court decision upholds funding for non-Catholic students

Labour & Employment Constructive dismissal and COVID-19 | Stuart Rudner

COVID-19

Current guidelines for urgent parenting motions during COVID-19