We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close
Focus On
In-House Counsel | Insurance | Intellectual Property | Immigration | Natural Resources | Real Estate | Tax

Fine line between plain language and inappropriate commentary in judicial decisions | Michael Spratt

Wednesday, May 03, 2017 @ 8:40 AM | By Michael Spratt

Judges have a duty to provide reasons for their decisions. This would seem to be self-evident. But it wasn’t — at least not until 2002 when the Supreme Court of Canada...