We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close
Focus On
NEW In-House Counsel | Insurance | Intellectual Property | Immigration | Natural Resources | Real Estate | Tax
Borrows

Insistence on French for SCC judges could block historic appointment of first Indigenous judge

Tuesday, August 01, 2017 @ 7:10 AM | By Cristin Schmitz


The Trudeau government’s pledge to fill the Supreme Court of Canada’s impending western vacancy with a bilingual jurist who can function in French is liable to block the historic appointment of its first Indigenous judge, lawyers say.

Borrows

John Borrows, University of Victoria Law School

The Indigenous Bar Association (IBA) has pressed Ottawa for years to make an Indigenous appointment to the 142-year-old court and will do so again for the spot that is opening  up when Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin retires Dec. 15, said IBA president Koren Lightning-Earle of Maskwacis, Alta.

However the Trudeau government’s insistence that all its Supreme Court appointees be able to read and understand French, without translation, is an additional and unfair hurdle for Indigenous candidates and a “detriment to Canada,” Lightning-Earle told The Lawyer’s Daily.

If the government “starts to think outside the box on what the language prerequisite actually means to Indigenous people, and [to] truly understand history and reconciliation … then they’ll understand why the [French] language prerequisite is ridiculous,” she explained. “Our first language is our Indigenous language. And then we were sent to residential school where we were told we were not allowed to speak our language, and we were forced to speak a colonial language [English]. And now we have to speak another colonial language — just to get a seat at the table!”

The Trudeau government vowed during the election to appoint only Supreme Court judges able to function in both English and French. This was in response to concerns expressed by Quebecers, Acadians and other francophones outside Quebec that it does a disservice to their appeals when the top court’s anglophone judges can’t understand nuanced French oral argument (because interpretation is not always perfect) or read French written briefs and supporting materials (which are usually not translated).

However Lightning-Earle points out the prime minister and his government have also committed to reconcile with Indigenous peoples, as a top priority. “You don’t just get to put up a barrier and say ‘Well this is our requirement’ — without acknowledging the history — which is the spirit and intent [of] the reconciliation that the government supposedly signed on to,” she remarked.

Lorne Sossin

Lorne Sossin, Osgoode Hall Law School

Certainly the language prerequisite is a major obstacle for Indigenous candidates. There are, at most, a handful of Supreme Court-calibre Indigenous jurists in the west who are able to understand and read French without translation. Saskatchewan provincial court judge Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, who is Cree, is one, as is Vancouver litigator and Indigenous law expert Jean Teillet, who is Métis.  

“There are barriers that Aboriginal lawyers and judges face that non-Aboriginal people don’t face,” Teillet told The Lawyer’s Daily. “And language is always one of those things. And so putting that kind of qualification on a Supreme Court appointment … will mean, as a fact, that we will have not an Aboriginal judge on the Supreme Court of Canada for a very long time. It won’t be because there are not really excellent Aboriginal lawyers and judges who are capable — more than capable — of doing the job. It will be because of the language barrier.”

Among those who appear to be affected is internationally acclaimed Indigenous law scholar John Borrows, 54 — who many see as a star candidate.

A member of the Chippewas of the Nawash First Nation on Georgian Bay, Borrows is currently in immersion French studies in Montreal. He is a visiting professor at McGill University’s faculty of law where he is learning about the civil law while on sabbatical leave from his post as Canada research chair in Indigenous law at the University of Victoria’s faculty of law, where he is co-developing the first joint program in Canadian common law/Indigenous law, expected to start up in 2018.

Osgoode Hall Law School dean Lorne Sossin believes Borrows “would be an outstanding choice to join the court.” He should not be blocked as he gets his French up to speed, Sossin opined.

“He is the leading scholar on Indigenous law and constitutional ideas/perspectives — among several other topics,” Sossin told The Lawyer’s Daily. “He has both a national and global reputation, and is certainly among the top handful of Canadian legal academics [in any field] in terms of impact on law and policy, and in particular in shaping the public dialogue on reconciliation.”

Kent Roach

Kent Roach, University of Toronto Faculty of Law

Borrows, whose great-grandfather and great-great-grandfather attended residential schools, has for years dedicated himself to learning Ojibwe. “Knowledge of an Indigenous language is an important asset, and speaks to the broader recognition that expertise with Indigenous legal traditions will be critical to the future capacity and credibility of the Supreme Court,” Sossin said.

University of Toronto constitutional and criminal law professor Kent Roach agreed that Borrows — recent winner of the prestigious Killam Prize in social sciences for his “substantial and distinguished scholarship and commitment to furthering our knowledge about Indigenous legal traditions,” would be an “excellent” choice to succeed Chief Justice McLachlin, who writes much of the court’s lndigenous law jurisprudence.

“He has done so much to raise awareness about Indigenous law in Canada and is a globally recognized innovator in his scholarship,” Roach said of his former colleague and friend. “The [Supreme] Court has relied on his scholarship in the past, and would benefit greatly from his expertise, including his excellent writing skills. John also has the perfect disposition to be a judge. He is an excellent and empathetic listener and a person of the highest integrity.”

Robert Janes of Victoria’s JFK Law also said Borrows “would be an excellent choice. [He] has a good grasp on the law generally, and has thought deeply about the Indigenous law question.”

Borrows did not comment for this article. But there is plenty of information about him publicly available. He has written or co-edited seven books, including a constitutional law textbook and published more than 50 law journal articles. Six years ago he won the Canadian Law and Society Best Book award for Canada’s Indigenous Constitution, and in 2002 Recovering Canada won the Donald Smiley award for Best Book in Canadian Political Science.

“He’s brilliant — there’s no doubt about that,” said one constitutional law expert who did not wish to be named. “He is a superb writer. … He has a lot of knowledge about constitutional law — not necessarily just Indigenous, but division of powers, Charter [etc.]”

Robert Janes

Robert Janes, JFK Law

Among Borrows’ awards and fellowships, in June the Law Society of Upper Canada awarded him an honorary doctorate for his “leadership in Indigenous law,” adding to another from Dalhousie University, and his own PhD from Osgoode Hall. He is a lifetime Trudeau fellow for his outstanding achievement in political social sciences, a fellow of the Canadian Society of Arts, Humanities and Sciences and the Royal Society of Canada (Canada’s highest academic honour) and was declared an Indigenous People’s Counsel in 2012 by the IBA for his “outstanding achievements in the practice of law and service to Indigenous peoples.”

He has taught law full time at Osgoode, UBC, University of Toronto and the University of Minnesota and had visiting appointments internationally in Australia, New Zealand and the United States.

He joined the Law Society of B.C. after articling with prominent constitutional litigator Joe Arvay, and assisted both the Indian residential schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Ipperwash inquiry.

In addition to Indigenous law, he has taught contracts, U.S. federal law and U.S. constitutional law, Canadian constitutional law, criminal law, property law, environmental law and land use planning, as well as given seminars to judges of almost all courts. He won the University of Victoria Law Students Society Teaching Award in 2009.

Borrows who grew up near an Ontario reserve on the shores of Georgian Bay and graduated from the University of Toronto with a bachelor’s degree in political science and history and a master’s in geography. Married for 32 years to visual artist Kim Borrows, he has two daughters, ages 31 and 29 — of which the younger will soon be called to the bar. A passionate outdoorsman, Borrows kayaks, hikes and cycles. He has made it a habit for 30 years to run one hour each day.

This story has been corrected.